|
Metal detector reviews Tesoro Cibola field test
Tesoro
Cibola
I met with Steve at a local
field which has produced some nice Roman finds Many machines can be unstable here Steve uses a Tejon, this
showdown would be an ideal test to see if the Cibola's
performance is really matched to the Animal.
The set up was simple, switch on, turn the sensitivity up
to 10, press the pin point button and set the threshold so I
could hear a slight hum, set the discrimination to the Iron
position...and search.
The Cibola ran very smooth I was impressed on how well it
behaved, high sensitivity caused no problems at all, even when
turned well into the red section. On this site we run the Tejons
at 6 to keep them tame, the Cibola's Iron rejection was
fantastic, I felt the pre set "Iron" mark was a little high so I
lowered it slightly, now it was set to how I wanted, I could hear
the iron as a broken sound, a good target was always smooth and
repeatable.Having experimented with the discrimination I was starting to
realise how different the Cibola actually was. With a disc
setting of zero it would only reject the smallest of nails as you
raise the setting it started to reject bigger Iron without
loosing small targets, I can only describe it as "progressive"
iron rejection. I found an Ideal setting was between the minimum
and the word "iron", when checking a signal you can confirm the
target by simply thumbing the disc to the Iron and listen for the
change. What Tesoro have actually done is given the user a bigger
scale or "finer tuning" of the Iron rejection,which will be a
real bonus when searching ancient sites.
Throughout our 3 hour search there was not one occasion where the
Tejon out did the Cibola, every target was checked, depth was the
same we both got caught out on the same pieces of misshaped large
iron, We felt the Tejon gave a harder hit on very small and
deeper targets, the Cibola gave a soft quiet tone.
This is where our next discovery was made.
The threshold tone was originally set to a slight
hum(with the pin point pressed in), which gave a nice audio
indication of depth, However if it was turned up the Cibola was
transformed, small and deep targets were sharp and loud, the
field was almost alive with clicks and spits, this well behaved
machine had just turned on the attitude, in fact if the
threshold was turned fully up the circuitry became
unstable, its almost like a second sensitivity. One disadvantage
of running a high threshold tone is that the pin- point VCO is
not so precise.With a little practice you can find the "sweet
spot" where there is a fine balance between a loud and usable
threshold.
My Cibola finds consisted of 1 Roman,1 Charles 1st hammered, 2
Strap ends, at least 15 pieces of assorted lead and dross, not
bad for a quick test.
I gave the machine to Steve, he first commented on how light
it was, he was very impressed with the performance and Iron
rejection he gave it the thumbs up, another point he commented on
was the Cibolas ability to find good targets in and around Iron,
the "see through" capabilities were excellent, this machine
requires a slow sweep speed for best results a little like the
Lobo.
Although I was impressed with this machine I needed another
opinion, because its so easy to get excited about something new
and loose the reality of things. I e-mailed a friend Tony who
lives up north but travels this way regularly with work,Tony is
very critical about machines and puts them through some almost
impossible tests, things that most of us would not even think
about, he is looking for tiny Saxon coins in bad soil littered
with nails obtaining 2 inches depth is considered acceptable.
I asked him to drop in next time he was down as I had something
to show him and to bring a bucket of that nasty soil he keeps
telling me about.Tony turned up 2 days later with his test
pieces, machines and soil. We compared the Cibola against all our
machines combined, several different tests,coins next to iron,
gold next to nails, tiny Saxon coins buried in bad Iron
contaminated soil which stained your hand black when you touched
it. The Cibola was easily on par with the best available I got
the seal of approval from Tony
that was good enough for me. Summing
up
Yes this is a new
"hot" Tesoro, no bells or whistles just raw power combined with
good Iron rejection...what more can a relic hunter ask
for.
Its been really
hard keeping a lid on this one during testing.
 
My best find so
far,a Silver Roman.
Geta son of Septimius Severus 209-212 Ad
 Marks
10/10
This is one of the tests we
tried with the Cibola
Recovery speed and discrimination

Reject a large nail
 Place a coin as close to the Iron as possible,
the tesoro cibola easily located the hammered coin with a clean
signal less than 1cm away from the Iron.
Impressive....I think so, even better when you think the Tesoro
Cibola only costs £399.00
will your metal detector pass this test.
The badly mineralised soil test
  This badly mineralised soil is laced with tiny
Iron particles,
most "top of the range" metal detectors will not even find a
small coin less than 2 inches deep.The Cibla was in the top 3 we
tested.
Copied from www.garysdetecting.co.uk
Home |
Contact |
About us |
Accessories |
Special offers |
Links|
Terms &
Conditions
Tesoro |
Laser |
XP
|
Garrett
|
|